Retoucher Priscila Desingz
I've written countless times here about my near death experience at age three and how that changed my view of death. I do not fear it. Nevertheless, I do not seek or court it either. My fascination with longevity should tell you how much I want to remain in this world a very long, long time - but, like countless others, on my own terms.
The only freedom we can find in this life comes when we let go of fear, and the cardinal fear we share as humans is of our own death, so where is the cowardice if one elects to take control of it? Shakespeare's most famous soliloquy deals with exactly that idea. He asks why we would suffer "the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" when suicide is an option...
When he himself might his Quietus makeI was surprised at the reaction to my post Coming Back From Adversity. We use the word suicide for a complex of things: in the post, I mentioned that my 30x great grandmother Tyra starved herself to death after her husband died. It might have been just simple depression, or what Josefina described as sheer exhaustion in a comment on the previous post, or perhaps an exercise of the ancient custom of honorable suicide to escape public humiliation, torture, or enslavement by the enemy following loss in a war. Since Tyra's husband, the King of Norway, died in battle, it is likely she saw honor in a death that saved her from having to wed her husband's murderer.
With a bare Bodkin? Who would Fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered Country, from whose bourn
No Traveller returns, Puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have,
Than fly to others that we know not of.
Thus Conscience does make Cowards of us all,
And thus the Native hue of Resolution
Is sicklied o'er, with the pale cast of Thought,
And enterprises of great pitch and moment,
With this regard their Currents turn awry,
And lose the name of Action.
As a student of literature, I am aware that suicide was not a taboo in antiquity; Christianity ushered in the first precepts against it. Prior to that, honor death existed in ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome. Although suicide violates Jewish Law, the mass suicide of Jews at Masada to avoid enslavement by ancient Rome is considered an act of heroism by those of the Jewish faith to this day.
A dream last night reminded me of Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen's great masterpiece Hedda Gabler (1891). Hedda ends it all when she falls into a trap laid by the local judge to force her into an illicit relationship with him. The play concludes with Hedda's honor suicide, and Ibsen plays up the connection between this act and Hedda's strong connection to her father, the late General Gabler. Literary critics argue about Hedda: was she an early feminist who took a stand against a corrupt and misogynistic society or was she a deranged and manipulative villain? Those of us who know Ibsen as a pioneer for women's rights embrace the former interpretation.
In that context, I honestly stumbled onto a strong societal taboo. I have never looked at suicide as universally cowardly or aberrant. There's an implied moral superiority in calling another person weak. To make suicide an issue of weakness vs. courage implies a condemnation not of the act but of the person, and that is a rather cruel after-the-fact kick in someone's balls.
In the 1970s I learned in psychology class that people who take their own lives may be acting on the mirror image impulse to one who takes the lives of others. My preference would be suicide over homicide, that people would kill themselves and not take the rest of us with them. Which do you prefer: Tennessee Williams, who swallowed a bottle of pills in a hotel room after a breakup with his longtime lover, or Brynn Omdahl who, distraught over their breakup, murdered husband Phil Hartman.
If you choose death, take that journey alone. To take others with you - that is cowardice, in my opinion. That I absolutely decry. How many murderers have we watched on televised trials who care nothing about the life or lives they took but fight vigorously and shamelessly to keep their own? A bestial embrace of the life force does not necessarily denote valor.
Assumptions, folks, prejudices, judgements of others without knowing the circumstances - that's what's bothering me about the comment thread on my previous post. Suicide is one choice no one else can make for you, a pure ACT of free will, and it appears to occur as a result of cultural beliefs. Here are the top ten countries by suicide rate in 2009/2010:
1 Lithuania
2 South Korea
3 Guyana
4 Kazakhstan
5 Belarus
6 Japan
7 Hungary
8 Russia
9 Latvia
10 Slovenia
I expected to see Japan there; this is the culture of World War II's Kamikaze. I expected Denmark to be in the top ten, but in fact it is #35; our perception of the suicidal Dane may have originated with Shakespeare's Hamlet. What I see is a prevalence of Eastern European countries. Having read a fair amount of their literature and studied Russian literature quite thoroughly, I know we are talking about prevalent cultural philosophies - systems of intellectual thought that affect this decision making.
Should we not have as much respect for philosophical/cultural beliefs as we do the Judeo-Christian commandments that have made suicide a taboo?
You may recall I wrote about changing my opinion of removing life support when I watched my mother die in early October. I used to think this was a no-brainer; no hope, pull the plug. Not any more. It's life, and when someone clings to it, I'm not sure who has the right to remove the support we've put in place. Her death was brutal, and I changed my own legal request regarding life support because of it.
We must always look beneath the surface for the why of common practice. In this case, I saw a financial aspect to the decision. Maintaining a life costs a great deal of money in the United States, and she was old, after all. Maybe she was old and the prognosis wasn't good, but she wasn't deciding for herself. Others were deciding for her. The person who made the decision immediately left the hospital and did not stay to watch. What does that tell you about life and death decisions? Cowardice? There it is for you.
Why is this OK and suicide is not?
Just as removing life support is a more complex issue than we think it is, until we encounter it, suicide is also complex. I wonder how many times a suicide is a cry for help or done in a moment of depression or passion and accidentally succeeds. I wonder how many times it is an alternative for homicide, a way of "getting even" with someone who has already "killed" something in you, i.e., suicide as revenge. But these are not passive non-responses. They are actions. They are choices. Religion, philosophy, cultural norms all affect our views on suicide.
I am sorry to hear suicide called cowardice and dismissed as a mental aberration. Entire world cultures would have to be cowardly and mentally ill if that were universally true, and I'd need a lot of evidence before I made that ASSUMPTION.
I have never made any wholesale assumption about people who choose to end their own life. I can only speak for myself: that I am not afraid of death. If I'm afraid of anything, it's the potential for harm in the sweeping prejudices of people, the quickness with which we judge others and attribute motives to them and critique their moral character.
9 comments:
I also expected Japan to be on the list, not because of kamikaze, but because of seppuku. Seppuku was the ritual suicide usually performed by samurai, and often even allowed with respect by enemies so that the samurai could choose his own end rather than be defeated in battle (and possibly captured and tortured anyway).
I grew up in Japan, but I don't think the samurai had anything to do with my own suicide attempt. For me, it wasn't so much a matter of being weak as it was being short-sighted. I didn't see any other way of getting away from the bullying, short of going Columbine, which as you mentioned would have been the weaker choice.
I got away from the bullies and found a community that eventually built me up to something that is now suicide-proof. And though I still have trials and tribulations up to this very moment, I'm glad I didn't succeed in my attempt a quarter of a century ago. Sometimes running away isn't necessarily a cowardly thing, either.
That being said, I've been in the situation. It's not exactly an easy choice. Especially for someone who at the time was very religious and the taking of a life had even more serious consequences. I was taught to believe that if you commit suicide, you get a direct pass to hell. What was going through my mind at the time was, "Well, since I'm already here? . . . "
So, yeah. It's not a cowardly thing. Not to say I'm advocating it. If anyone reading this is thinking I'm saying it's OK because you're having a bad hair day, it's not. Get help. Someone can help you run away so you can live to fight another day.
I am so sorry you were bullied, Phydeau. There is nothing more reprehensible, but I think you and I both know that if you survive it you become a Man or Woman of Steel. You learn what you're made of.
One need not advocate suicide but I see no reason to judge the person who chooses it either. I think of all the great writers I studied who took their own lives as reasonable adults, Ernest Hemingway, Sylvia Plath, Tennessee Williams, and Virginia Woolf among them.
No one would ever accuse Mr. Hemingway of weakness or cowardice. I posted a few months ago on new information that proves he was right about being stalked by the FBI and CIA. I think I'd shoot myself, too, if I faced another nine months in a mental institution for telling the truth. That it was the Mayo Clinic psychiatric division makes this all the more insidious to me.
But that's another story. Thank you for the honest and eloquent contribution to the discussion.
Ok, why not. I'll tag in, and charge it off to self inflicted therapy.
Suicide a complex subject? Yea, complex like the situation of a guy with a pink slip, a wife, two lovers, a mortgage and all of 'em three months overdue is complex.
I've never gotten close to suicide, not deliberately. Come close to killing myself with stupidity and poor judgment a few times, that just goes with living loose on the land as it were. But there's way to much anger in me to do my enemies dirty work for them. If they want me dead they'll have to kill me, and I'll do my best to make sure it costs them more than it cost me. I've contemplated initiating combat against those enemies knowing my chances of victory were nill, chance of survival the same, but the problem with that is making sure the casualties you inflict are actually in objective fact the enemy (the demand of internal honor and ethics, make sure it is a private war and not an act of insanity).
That thought abated when I realized my enemy was not an individual, or even some group of individuals, but rather the collective entities of society, the injustices and inhumanities needed by such entities for their survival codified into tradition and from there into law. I quit thinking in terms of suicide by swat team when I realized who my real enemies were, and how to attack them. They may yet kill me should my attacks begin to make progress, but that will be their choice, not mine.
I will make the argument that suicide is the ultimate form of self rejection, for one reason or another. I will equally assert that with the exception of a self chosen euthanasia (yea, I know, another complex subject) the vast majority of what are called suicides are actually murders perpetrated by the collective entities using psychological weapons against individuals the collective entity finds a threat or impediment.
In "The Art of the Dreamweaver" I said " The impediments to self acceptance are rooted in the acceptance of society. It is beyond this scope to speak to such a thought, but again, a challenge: find me any motive to reject the self, to deny self acceptance, that is not ultimately derived from outside of that self. Find a motive for any individual to deny themselves acceptance of themselves that did not come from family, society, or the culture of their birth. In that context I was speaking of the self acceptance needed to build an intimate relationship of value with another individual, but the thought holds true as well for what should be (but all to often is not) the penultimate intimate relationship: the relationship between the self and the life producing that self.
I've stared at this one for a long time guys. Had my wife lived long enough she would have suffered the fate of being trapped alive and aware in total sensory deprivation caused by an ongoing deterioration in her mid-brain, the connections between the senses and the cognitive centers. She and I lived for over seven years knowing this fact. Death was kind to her where fate was not, he took her while still she lived. Had he not I was prepared to do his job for him when it came time: I'd have shot her, taken her out clean to end fate's cruelty, and then shot myself to satisfy what the collective entity called "law" would demand. Yes, I would have.
CJ, you talk about realizing things after someone is gone? I've recently realized that when she drove me away for six months in 2006 it was that very thing motivating her: she knew me better than anyone, she knew I'd do it, for her, and she didn't want my life tied to her fate. Her anger was for burdening her conscience with that knowledge. It was in fact her ultimate expression of her love for me. Yet another understanding I owe my muse, the above mentioned dreamweaver.
Yea, suicide is a complex subject. Think I'm gonna go drink a beer now, crank up some tunes, and draw a picture of beautiful naked people doing something both acrobatic and interesting.
Thanks for writing for the heart, Cyranos (of course, you always do). I hope the beer helps.
Helloooo my sweety Carla!
I do not know if you heard, but here in Italy there have been suicides because of the economic crisis.
At least six cases. Incredible!
I did not know of your experience at the 'age of three years.
I think that death is something essential, normal
to change the course of life.
When we are faced with death, we change our views.
I think suicide is the easiest thing to do,
the difficulty is to address and combat our problems.
Kisses kisses baaaciiii: D
Death is a natural part of life, my dear Daniele, and suicide of course is not considered natural in some belief systems. In others, it is and has been considered an individual right. I see more complexity in the issue. I wonder why a person can remove his mother's life support and walk out of the hospital without waiting for her to die, but suicide is a taboo. In this case, she could not make the choice to live or die, and we think that is OK. She was my mother, too, and I stayed with her to the last breath. She fought like hell to stay alive.
Some things don't make sense to me. What this post is about - to me - is NOT suicide per se, but an individual's right to choose life or death, and why we think it's OK to choose for others but not to allow others to choose for themselves.
Wow! I hope THAT translates!
Wonderful!
I traslate very good! :D
I think It's not Ok to choose for other and compel to continue the life.
Everyone have the power to live his life, everyone have the mide to choose life or death.
I think that choosing own death is not wrong, but easy, for us to get away from problems. Flee from them.
"She fought like hell to stay alive"
your mother is to be admired,
but a lot of people haven't power to continue their life.
Life is like a fight, we can fight and win,
fighting and losing, or not to fight.
Our choice should have respect, and we must do it for us.
You challenge me again, Dr. L.! I have only seconds, so I'll just say that it is often not the suicide that is the tragedy, but the circumstances that force one into it.
Excellent point, Jochanaan. I completely agree!!!
Post a Comment